Lisa Coe writes The Rector’s Wife’s blog
Posted by website janitor on July 15th, 2010‘Rev’ on TV - Don’t get me started…
Hey you script commissioners at the BBC! Why didn’t you say you were looking for a new series about the clergy? TRW has lots of ideas. Here’s one - it’s called Luther. Okay he’s a plain clothes monk and his schtick is that he’s got a bit of a temper on him, shouting and the like. To be fair, he is single handedly tackling the corrupt members of the mediaeval Catholic Church and principally the Pope, no wonder he gets grumpy give him a break. How about this plot device; he’s a cop, she’s a priest. Together they patrol the rough streets of (anywhere really, South Shields, Barrow in Furness etc), fighting crime and attending Deanery Synod……. together they are ‘Dempsey and Maythepeacebewithyou’. I think it might have legs as they say in the writing business. Or you can use this, an outdoor site, say Centre Parcs, gather lots of different clergy type people to perform outrageous and disgusting challenges (nothing to do with their private lives obviously!) Call it, oh I don’t know, “I’m a Celebrant get me out of here.” Any one of those would stand up to scrutiny especially the one about the police ‘n priests as that really happened to The Rector but that’s another story. All that originality and we’re stuck with Rev. the new sitcom about a vicar. Rev. is to the church what Footballers Wives was to football, yes I know, that bad. Badder maybe. I knew it wouldn’t be much good just from its description, (it almost had the title ‘Handle with Prayer’) and I know these things. I guessed the entire plot of the movie “Have you heard about the Hendersons” just by scrutinising the poster. So I’m good, I make no apologies and I knew this one would be as predictable as Norman Wisdom approaching a swimming pool. And it is.
It’s the reverse of the Vicar of Dibley in formula. Single female vicar / married male. Urban parish / inner city, coterie of lovable oddballs/ er… It all feels a bit paper thin on character. The vicar Adam is a nice chap but a bit of a smoker and drinker; subtext he’s got some sort of faith but not a God botherer like some eh, I mean come on, he has to have a life!. The archdeacon is modelled on either Dracula or Peter Mandelson or both. He’s vicious and waspish and sometimes wears strangler’s gloves. As a series it belongs somewhere in the genre of Mind your Language or ‘Allo ‘Allo for clichéd stereotyping of people and situations. And because most of the plot lines and characters are outrageously exaggerated to panto level TRW wonders to whom is this programme supposed to appeal? Christians won’t waste their time on it and for anyone else it will just amplify uninformed opinions already held about clergy/believers. Please, I’m begging you writer whoever you are, please don’t tell us that these programmes are holding a gnats worth of truth in them, that somehow this is some sort of mirror for us to behold ourselves in? That really would be hilarious if that was the aim.
Nah, course it’s not. In the end it is just lazy writing. Situations that have caused much anxiety and real soul searching amongst Christians are reduced to a couple of clumsy sentences. It’s like seeing a patchwork hacked to pieces then cobbled together with staples. My feeling is if you are going to relentlessly stereotype and deconstruct, well you’ve got a long way to go. That kind of writing was done way better ages ago with The Comic Strip Presents. Think of the genius observations of ‘Strike’ or ‘The Yob’ or ‘Five go mad in Dorset’, any one of which could have been a series in its own right. Or ‘Father Ted’. Graham Linehan and Arthur Mathews ruthlessly hung their hapless clergy out to dry week after week but it was genuinely funny because they knew their subject matter inside out and it came from a place of exasperated affection. Rev. seems to be written by someone who attended clergy boot camp for a week and will settle for cheap laughs.
The only genuine bit was when Adam and his wife were attempting to ignite their dwindling love life. There was something honest and humorous and a bit racy in those scenes that I think probably connected with many of their audience. Something about those scenes rang true as though the writer understood something of the inherent problems of middle aged relationships badly needing to be remanticesed. That’s romance being reinvested in: TRW has just invented a word and already is wondering what the Scrabble score value might be!
Two thoughts before I never have to think about this again and can get back to Holby, what with Greys Anatomy finishing its current season.
‘Rev’s’ producer is the same one who produced the Jonathan Ross show, need I say more. The other is that I read somewhere that Tom Hollander who plays the Rev, (and was incidentally the odious clergyman Mr. Collins in the Pride and Prejudice movie. It’s a dog collar thing obviously), spent some time shadowing a clergyman to get the feel of the role and the details of clergy life. I have no idea what impact this had on him personally/spiritually or who it was he spent time with. However if someone came to St. Matthews to get an idea of what it’s all about I’d like to think they would leave with an undeniable sense of the nuances and subtleties and incremental movement of the Holy Spirit who is the wave that pounds and shapes and moulds we stubborn rocks into the finest material he can use. Taking an age or changing us in a second of revelation. To know the extraordinary and mind blowing experience of feeling the breath of God upon you and ultimately meeting with the undeniable and irresistible person of the risen Lord Jesus who changes lives forever. Yeh, now I’d like to see that in a programme about clergy. So stop writing toe-curlingly bad dialogue and do better. Or I might have to write it myself
Search this site